Since I have studied and taken a B.A. in political science I can assure you that enabling people to decide about everything not necessarilyleads to better decisions. In fact, the result can be decisions that harm the community because in the end mostly a minority is voting over the topic and this way overuling the majority. Not talking about that every decision gets delayed and the leadership is not able to react quickly if needed. Also, lots of time and ressources get dragged away (we are better off spending our time in creating mappack 3, advertisement video, events, etc.).
Because of that modern democracies have an elected group of -not always, but mostly- experts that try to make the best decisions for everybody. Of course that leads to other problems but still it is one of the best ideas to rule. [FHSW]Europe is led in a similar way and that is working out for nearly 10 years now. This proves how good our model is.
exactly because we must stop those who want to destroy that was built. (this community) gameplayer does not seem to be such a guy and we know that. so those who are here a long time should decide less exaggerated things. for those who are not toxic players! and so we should not come into confrontation between us, not even gameplayer or marduk ... or anyone who is here should be in conflict. this can be a risk for us unnecessary and that can ruin our fun environment. well that's what i think.
marduk you are a great administrator, but sometimes you might be too exaggerated? people do not like exaggeration they get nervous.